One proposal, backed by allies of former President Mohamed Abdullahi Farmaajo, calls for adopting a one-person, one-vote electoral system, arguing that direct elections would strengthen democratic legitimacy and provide a lasting solution to Somalia’s recurring political disputes. Supporters contend that universal suffrage would give citizens a greater voice in choosing their leaders while helping modernize the country’s electoral process.

A second proposal advocates a negotiated transitional arrangement that would preserve elements of the existing indirect electoral model while allowing additional time to prepare for nationwide direct elections. Proponents argue that Somalia’s security challenges and institutional limitations make an immediate transition to universal voting difficult, and that a phased approach would reduce the risk of political instability.

The third proposal emphasizes a comprehensive national dialogue involving the federal government, opposition groups and regional administrations before any electoral framework is finalized. Supporters believe broad political consensus is essential to rebuilding trust among Somalia’s competing political actors and ensuring that any constitutional or electoral reforms are accepted across the country.

The debate reflects broader disagreements over Somalia’s political future. President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s constitutional reforms and electoral agenda have drawn criticism from several opposition figures and some federal member states, who argue that major constitutional changes should be implemented only through inclusive consultation. The dispute has contributed to months of political uncertainty, prompting neighboring countries and international organizations to encourage renewed negotiations.

The timing of the discussions is particularly significant as Somalia continues to confront serious security challenges posed by the al-Shabaab insurgency. Analysts warn that prolonged political divisions could weaken coordination between national and regional authorities at a time when unified leadership remains critical to maintaining security and advancing state-building efforts. International partners have similarly cautioned that political infighting risks undermining progress achieved through years of international support.

Although no agreement has yet been reached, the presentation of multiple proposals marks an important step toward restarting negotiations. Political observers say the willingness of stakeholders to place competing ideas on the table suggests there remains room for compromise despite deep differences over the country’s constitutional and electoral future.

For Somalia, the coming weeks are likely to be decisive. A consensus on an electoral roadmap could ease political tensions, strengthen public confidence and allow leaders to refocus on security and economic priorities. Failure to reach an agreement, however, could prolong uncertainty at a time when the country is seeking to consolidate democratic institutions and strengthen its role within the East African region.